1. Buzz Bissinger - WTF?
As Im sure many of you blog fans have read on Deadspin, Kissing Suzy Kolber, or Every Day Should be Saturday (EDSBS), Buzz Bizzinger is the ire of the blogging world after his comments on the Bob Costas show last night. Here is a great synopsis of what occurred (from AOL Sports Fanhouse). I'd say he needs about $100LARGE worth of indulgences to clean up his mess. This guy is getting railed on by the entire internet, so I wont waste your time. There is great stuff about the Buzz situation on the blogs I have linked above. I enjoyed his book "3 Nights in August", but won't ever buy another piece of his again.
2. NFL Draft Coverage - I want to know who is picked, a little about the player, and then what Mel Kiper or Ron Jaworski thinks about the pick. Unfortunately, I got too little of what I wanted and too much of the below during ESPN's NFL Draft coverage this past weekend:

- Todd McShay (McGay), Chris Berman, and Keyshawn Johnson
all fighting for words with more seasoned analysts that we want to hear from (Mortensen, Kiper, Jackson, Jaworksi). Too many morons fighting for the microphone, causing the analysis to lock continuity or flow, and become confusing.- Too little Mel Kiper Jr. Say what you will, this guy is to NFL
Scouting media coverage what Bill James is to baseball statistics. Kiper isnt always right, but he brings a wealth of knowledge and contacts to the table. More of him, less of awful suit Keyshawn. - And the Grand Pontification of ESPN's NFL Draft coverage - Camera crews at every potential draftees house, oftentimes revealing the outcome of a pick before it happens. Teams call a player before they make an official pick. Well, ESPN was filming these players celebrating before the pick was made. Then they would hit up a commercial break, coming back to see the official pick being made of what the viewer already knew. How about just a little suspense for this male soap opera, please?
More NFL draft coverage like this would be appreciated:
3. BCS Playoff Discussion - The BCS committee met the past few days and officially rejected the idea of a playoff. Everyone wants a playoff, and its going to take 20 years to get it. Most in need of Pontificating - the fact that we keep talking on and on about a playoff each year. Here are some agreed upon beliefs,
pretty much close to fact:- A playoff would be wildly entertaining and much better way to crown the national champion
- A playoff could make plenty of money and likely would make much more than the current system
- Scheduling issues about when to play all the playoff games would be minimal; play some during December, the season could end at approximately the same time as it does now
So why no playoff? Simple. More facts:
- The BCS is as financially healthy for all the schools involved as any college bowl system ever
- Very handsome TV contracts are signed and done through 2014. Any change to the formula would call for those to be renegotiated and could be a risk
- Any type of playoff will cause revenue uncertainty for all major conferences
All BCS conferences are guaranteed one $17M paycheck per year, at a minimum. Any type of a playoff would be very difficult to negotiate $$, and could likely cause the $$ to be spread out over more teams (like the NCAA Basketball Tournament revenues, spread over all 350ish Division 1 teams). That means less money guaranteed. Presidents and Athletic directors dont have the balls to take that chance.
I find it interesting that the Pac-10 and Big 10 are against it. Obviously there is some Rose Bowl snobbery there, an appreciation for tradition in spite of better alternatives.
































(pictured) and both his taste for 20 year old female students and his no name players that included Kelly Wise, and God knows who else, and now the current run to greatness with names like CDR, Dorsey, Rose, Anderson, and co. The Pope has been there and been a fan.



