Thursday, November 19, 2009

The Beginning of the End



With the loss to Pitt last weekend, most believe that the Charlie Weis era will end after the Stanford game next weekend. We are at the beginning of an annoying amount of media speculation, "updates" and other fodder that will be on every tv show, print newspaper, or magazine that covers sports. Personally, I will hate the two weeks because the games seem relatively meaningless until we know the fate of Coach Weis. Football fans are supposed to be excited about watching the games, but likely most ND fans are considerably less excited than normal for the final 2 games against UConn and Stanford. 


Remember over the next few weeks, that daily ESPN "updates" are typically nothing more than regurgitated quotes and speculation - rarely offering any true insight to the situation. If Athletics Director Jack Swarbrick is half the sensible business man he appears to be, his decision and the coaching search (if needed) will be as tight lipped as humanly possible. Information leaks to the media will only fuel the fire, typically resulting in coaches in speculation getting raises or extensions, or releasing statements saying they "aren't interested in Notre Dame". These measures are often incredibly selfish, using the ND coaching search for personal gain, based on pure rumor or hearsay and not actual interest by Notre Dame. My favorite was back 5 years ago when Mark Mangino (Kansas coach), "pulled his name out of the ND coaching search". Thanks Mark, I doubt we were interested. 


We've established that no one - not ESPN, not "IRISHFAN" handle on your favorite message board, nor your cousin that supposedly is friends with Charlie Weis's family  -  no one knows whether Weis will officially be fired, or who his replacement might be. So now, we can move on not to speculation on whats actually going to happen, but opinions of what should happen. 


Charlie Weis should be fired by Notre Dame on Sunday, November 29th, the day after the Stanford game. 


Weis is a good man and a good, hard working coach. He has kept academics at the highest level possible, while recruiting good young men with football skills. His teams have nary had an off the field issue that was not minor in the grand scheme of a program (Tennessee, I'm looking at you!). He is an alum that gives what little time he has left to his family's charity, and he loves the school immensely. This man needs to be treated with respect and class, but alas, shown the door. 


As I've stated before, Weis will be remembered as the person who answered the key question of doubt about Notre Dame football: Can we recruit with the elite programs? The answer is a resounding yes. Notre Dame football can get enough talent to win a National Championship. Maybe not every year, and certainly there are less recruits available to us than Alabama, Florida, USC, etc. But the talent level will be there if you find the right recruiter. 


Moving on towards who the next coach should be is tough, but since this is a blog, we'll do it. Typically when teams or program fire a coach, they hire the opposite: someone with opposite traits to balance out the problems with the previous coach. We'll start with Weis's main problems that have caused him to be a failure as a head coach at Notre Dame, in my opinion:

  • Lack of head coaching experience
  • Lack of college head or assistant coaching experience
  • Defensive coaching

All this means two candidates rise as the top two guys in addition to the another candidate who always can have the job (Urban Meyer). The two coaches that fulfill the 3 deficiencies of the Weis era are Bob Stoops (Oklahoma) and Brian Kelly (Cincinnati). More next week on these 3 candidates and why I think each would be a good head coach at Notre Dame. Pitt game preview tomorrow. 

Friday, November 13, 2009

Pitt Preview


The Irish travel to #8 ranked Pittsburgh Saturday night (7pm, ABC) in what could be the most important game of Charlie Weis's career. The Pitt Panthers are 8-1 and have control of their own destiny in the Big East conference. Pitt is very talented and will be one of the if not the best team the Irish have faced all season. Yours truly will be on hand for the game at Heinz Field, which should be around 40 degrees at gametime.

Due to traveling, not much time available for a preview. During the week reading about Pitt, it sounds like this program is really confident and ready for the Irish. The Irish are either going to be inspired or scared, and I'm not sure which. Jimmy and company should be able to move the ball a bit on the Panthers, who have a great defensive line that is near tops in the country in sacks. Pitt has been efficient offensively, balanced with the pass and the run. This has the feel of a shootout in the 30s, a close game won by the team who gets the ball last. Turnovers will obviously be key - an area the Irish have performed well in every game except last week. I expect the Irish defense and defensive line in particular to thrive upon facing a pro style offensive attack instead of the option attack.

Flat out, this has the makings of being a great football game. I expect the Irish to play one of their better games of the year, but the game to still be close and in doubt. I have to give the edge because their front 4 should be able to rush Clausen  -  allowing more defenders to drop back into coverage. The home crowd and tension building under the Weis coaching situation will also favor the Panthers; a superhuman effort from Jimmy Clausen might not be enough. Prediction:

Pitt    34     Notre Dame  31

(Vatican Smoke is 6-3 picking ND games straight up, and 5-4 against the spread)

Much Maligned


Charlie Weis has been under fire the past three years as coach of the Irish. But after last week's loss to Navy, most people feel that his fate is clearly in his hands. There was doubt and wild amounts of speculation and uncertainty toward the end of each season, with the prevailing logic that Notre Dame would retain Weis. Now, the prevailing logic is that Weis will be fired. More than ever before, Weis's job security lies in wins and losses in the coming weeks. Here is how I think it will play out with 3 games remaining (@Pitt, vs UConn, @Stanford).

If Weis wins all 3 remaining games . . . He stays. 9-3 record with a Gator or Cotton Bowl bid, as well as 3 losses by a combined 12 points, please - this is a solid season and the 2nd straight year of a 3 game improvement in the win column. Recruiting stays strong, and next year the Irish should be a solid bet to win 9 or likely more games and get to the BCS.

If Weis wins just 1 game, or loses all 3 . . . He's gone. 7-5 or 6-6 is just not going to survive. My argument below about how to handle an 8-4 Weis could be applied here, but very likely he has to go with a record of 7-5 or worse. Unless his buyout is much worse than we expect, and no one worth a damn will coach the Irish, he's gone.

If Weis wins 2 of 3 . . . Tough decision. If the one loss was another close loss to a good team like Pitt or Stanford, that would give Weis an 8-4 record with 4 losses by 20 points (or so) total, which isn't terrible (Gator Bowl bid likely). Given the buyout of 5 remaining years on Weis's contract, this could be a very tough decision to make. How do we make it? Fire Weis only if we are sure that we have a top line coach ready to accept the job. If one of the following coaches is not available or none of them are remotely interested in the ND job, keep Weis; if one of the below is available and interested, fire him:

Brian Kelly (Head Coach of Cincinnati)
Jon Gruden (Former Tampa Bay Bucs head coach)
Urban Meyer (Florida Coach)
Bob Stoops (Oklahoma  Coach)

At 8-4, without one of those guys, I say keep Weis, giving the recruiting another year to grow. Why take a chance on a lesser candidate, when Weis is clearly recruiting well enough to be competitive, and just might turn the corner with time? ND doesnt have tons of time to give to Weis to develop as a coach, but given his buyout and the lack of certainty with other coaching alternatives, I think keeping/firing Weis based on the above is a smart move.

If another coach comes in and wins, Charlie will be remembered as a coach who loved his alma matre, and worked his but off to recruit and coach as best he could. He will be the guy who got us 75% of the way there, but couldn't finish the job. 75% of college football is recruiting, and Coach Weis proved that Notre Dame can recruit elite athletes and get #1 recruiting classes yet again. The next coach will have a better program than the one Charlie inherited - a program that can attain talent but needs the final ingredient to make talent better than the sum of the parts. I am rooting for Charlie Weis, but if he has to go, he has to go. Tomorrow is a big step.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Living on the Edge



The Irish have been living on the edge all season, and they fell yet again towards mediocrity against a very capable Navy Midshipmen team, 23-21. While Jimmy Clausen (72% completion, 454 yards passing), Golden Tate (9 catches, 132 yards), and Michael Floyd (10 catches, 141 yards) all had great days, two turnovers inside the 3 yard line and 2 missed field goals doomed the Irish. A few other key stats:

  • Navy had 402 yards total offense . . . including 350 of those on the ground. 
  • Navy's fullback position had 200 yards (!) of the total 350 yard rushing day for the Middies
  • Navy's passing game was used 3 times for 2 completions totalling 50 yards and 1 touchdown
  • Notre Dame had 512 yards total offense
  • Notre Dame was 2/6 scoring in the red zone, with 2 turnovers and 2 missed field goals. Score on one of those and the game is ours
That last bullet point really says it all  -  the Irish left 12 points on the field, at a minimum. And 12 points is assuming just 4 field goals, even though likely we'd have scored a TD or two in those 4 missed red zone chances. 


After the game, I was a part of a painful yet interesting debate between myself and my future father/brother in law, trying to determine who was at fault more, the Irish offense or the Irish defense. Of course the correct answer is both. Early in the season, the Irish defense was more at fault, giving the Irish offense zero margin for error. More recently, the Irish offense has sputtered in the red zone, using up even more of the razor thin margin for error delivered by a still inconsistent defense. Saturday, the sum of the two units' performances just wasn't enough. Each side has major issues (Offense - red zone offense, turnovers; Defense - fullbacks running wild for 200 yards (!!) ) - and it's pointless to debate which is the worst. No Notre Dame team can survive a full season with even 1 of these issues lingering, and quite frankly, we are lucky to be 6-3 right now. Saturday we just came up a play short - just like Washington and Boston College did against the Irish. 

Moving on - to use a page out of Lou Holtz's book  -  W.I.N. - "whats important now". For the Irish, W.I.N. is winning at least 2 of the final 3 games, heading to a New Years Day bowl (likely Gator - check my bowl game scenarios post from last week) and trying to keep the Charlie Weis era going. Win 0 or just 1 game of the final 3, and the Irish are looking for a new coach, seeing a slew of transfers, and losing a slew more of recruits. Also, Golden Tate and Jimmy Clausen would most certainly be gone to the NFL early, doubly feeling the loss of Coach Weis. Win all 3 games, and Weis is back on the "warm to lukewarm" coaching seat, just off the current "hot" seat. Simple directions, hard road, with @Pittsburgh (#8 in the country), vs UConn at home, and @Stanford (thrashed Oregon 51-42) remaining. 

Check back for more VaticanSmoke during the middle of the week - I'll explain why I think an 8-4 or 9-3 season, even now, is very possibly not enough to justify the firing of Charlie Weis. 

Friday, November 6, 2009

Pass the Alka-Selzer


Navy and Notre Dame meet for the 83rd time this Saturday at 1:30pm central time in Notre Dame Stadium. The Irish hold the all time record over the middies at 71-10-1, although the streak of 43 straight wins was snapped in 2007. Navy enters the game off a difficult loss last week to Temple (27-24), but still sports the same record as the Irish (6-2).

Game preview this week will be a little bit different than the "what to watch for". Navy and Notre Dame know each other very well, and typically don't surprise each other. Each year, many Irish fans have a little bit of anxiety about this game (at least I do). There are plenty of reasons Navy will be competitive and could beat us, while there are also plenty of reasons this game shouldn't be close. Both sides are compelling. Lets take a look at each:

Reasons Navy could win . . . 

  • 2007 & 2008  -  The Middies beat the Irish in 2007, 46-44 (OT), the last time they played in Notre Dame Stadium. While the Irish were favored to win that game, Navy featured one of its best offenses ever that season, while the 2007 Irish were possibly the worst Irish team in 50 years. Navy knows they can beat Notre Dame . . . which they almost did last year, having the ball in the final minute in Irish territory down by 6.
  • Defense  -  The 2009 Navy Defense is the best defense the Middies have had in years. Currently ranked #27 in the country in defensive yards allowed (ahead of Boston College, USC, and Virginia Tech), allowing only 316 yards per game. Navy is balanced but better against the pass, ranking 23rd in the country by air, 59th in defending by ground. Last year the Irish pounded the Middies, who will undoubtedly employ a bend but not break approach against the Irish passing attack. Problem is that with both teams running the ball, the game shortens, and mistakes are amplified . . . 
  • Time of Possession  -  Navy is 2nd in the country in time of possession, while the Irish are a very close 5th in the country in TOP. This will be an interesting battle for the clock. If the Middies can win the time of possession, look for this game to be close. Win the TOP, throw in a fumble and some onside kicks . . . and its 2008 all over again. Navy will be more disciplined than you at all times, and will be ready for your mistake. 

Reasons Notre Dame cruises to victory . . . 

  • 2007 & 2008  -  Same reason helping both teams? In 2007, Navy's offense was prolific, averaging 350 yards a game rushing; yet Navy needed two point conversions, overtime, and some crazy Irish turnovers to win the game against THE worst Notre Dame team in decades. Navy's offense is not as good this year; and the Irish, well, we've improved a bit since then. In 2008, Notre Dame dominated the football game. Leading 27-7 with 3 minutes to go, on the 5 yard line heading in, the Irish looked to be finishing off the most dominating win over Navy in a number of years. A fumble, a few crazy plays, and then two consecutive onsides kick recoveries in the final 2:30 made the game closer than it was. The Irish only gave up 11 first downs last year, completely dominating the middies until the panic struck in the final 3 minutes. How much has changed?
  • Rushing Attack  -  The Irish finally have a respectable rushing offense, ranked #59 in the country this season. Last year, the Irish racked up 230 yards rushing with last year's below average attack. While the Middies have improved greatly on defense, the Irish should be able to get to 200 yards rushing without breaking a sweat. Remember, Charlie Weis is 20-0 when he outrushes his opponent. If the Irish outrush the middies, which is very possible, it will take some crazy plays, turnovers, and onsides kicks for the Middies to win. 
  • Onsides Kicks  -  While the Middies may have some other tricks up their sleeves, the Irish are not going to be caught off guard and give up 2 straight on sides kicks to Navy. Weis has put his hands teams through all types of on sides kicks in practice this week, which should give the Irish more confidence if the game goes that way. Remember, if the Irish get the first onsides kick last year, the game ends 27-14. The kicks were the key to the Middies fighting back and scaring the sh*t out of Irish fans. 
Last year, Weis called 19 passes and 51 rushes. Tomorrow, expect more of the same, as the Irish try to pound it down Navy's throat on the ground, turning the tables on the Middies. Shorten the game for the Middies, giving them a taste of their own medicine. But this year, the Irish will finish the job, not turning the ball over and missing onsides kicks like crazy. Weis will pass if Navy allows, but he will gladly beat the Middies to a pulp on the ground if Navy wants to drop 8 guys into coverage against Clausen, Floyd, Tate, and Rudolph. Look for the Irish defense to have another solid effort against Navy, but give up a few longer passes early before adjusting and locking down. 


Official Prediction:  Don't bet on this game. The Middies have covered the spread an amazing 9 times in a row within Notre Dame stadium. The Irish are better than the Middies by two TDs, and that's what I am predicting. I wouldn't bet on this game if I were you.

Irish  31   Navy  17

(Vatican Smoke's season record picking the winner straight up, 6-2; against the spread, 4-4)